Old news, me acuerdo debatiendo acerca de esto a finales de enero, Lol, en ese articulo no nombraron a los strangelets, que en un escenario teórico es peor que tener un agujero negro, lastima que la cantidad de energía que se necesita para que realmente sea devastador es...inmensa.

Nadie se va a morir, señores:

An anonymous reader writes "Most people are aware of the recent articles
contending that the Large Hadron Collider at CERN might destroy the
world. While most scientists have no such concerns, a recent preprint
released to arxiv [0]systematically dismantles the notion. The gist of
the argument is this: Everything that will be created at the LHC is
already being created by cosmic rays. If a black hole created by the LHC
is interactive enough to destroy the world within the lifetime of the
sun, similar black holes are already being created by cosmic rays. Such
black holes would be stopped by dense cosmic objects (neutron stars and
white dwarfs). A black hole stopped in one of these objects would
eventually absorb it. We see sufficiently old neutron stars in the sky,
thus any black hole that could be created at the LHC, even if it is
stable, would have no effect on the earth on any meaningful timescale."

Y...
[0806.3381] Astrophysical implications of hypothetical stable TeV-scale black holes

Amarillistas, caballeros:
Mundo - "El laboratorio LHC tiene un 75% de probabilidad de extinguir la Tierra" - ADN.es

Una masa.

Aur'voir.